43869911959 http://1ucasvb.tumblr.com/post/43869911959/the-ballistic-ellipse-this-is-something-i-found 764 The ballistic ellipse This is something I found...

The ballistic ellipse

This is something I found when I was playing around with ballistic trajectories. I wondered what shape you would get if you connected all the apex points of all trajectories, if you only changed the angle and kept the same initial speed.

Surprisingly, you get an ellipse!

EDIT: Also, here it is in 3D! Naturally, you get an ellipsoid.

The equation for the ellipse is:

x2 / a2 + (y - b)2 / b2 = 1

Where a = v02 / (2g) and b = v02 / (4g). Naturally, v0 is the initial speed and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

In another curiosity, the eccentricity of this ellipse is constant for all values of v0 and g, and this value is e = √3 / 2.

Obviously, I wasn’t the first to find this. A quick search revealed a paper on arXiv from 2004 describing this. Still, it’s a nice little-known curiosity of a classical physics problem.

Bonus points: for which angles does the trajectory contain the foci of the ellipse?

The ballistic ellipse

This is something I found when I was playing around with ballistic trajectories. I wondered what shape you would get if you connected all the apex points of all trajectories, if you only changed the angle and kept the same initial speed.

Surprisingly, you get an ellipse!

EDIT: Also, here it is in 3D! Naturally, you get an ellipsoid.

The equation for the ellipse is:

x2 / a2 + (y - b)2 / b2 = 1

Where a = v02 / (2g) and b = v02 / (4g). Naturally, v0 is the initial speed and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

In another curiosity, the eccentricity of this ellipse is constant for all values of v0 and g, and this value is e = √3 / 2.

Obviously, I wasn’t the first to find this. A quick search revealed a paper on arXiv from 2004 describing this. Still, it’s a nice little-known curiosity of a classical physics problem.

Bonus points: for which angles does the trajectory contain the foci of the ellipse?

 
  1. neutralmu5 reblogged this from yunghau5
  2. jgoshiro reblogged this from 1ucasvb
  3. pretty-maths reblogged this from 1ucasvb
  4. agressiveexpansion reblogged this from 1ucasvb
  5. incompetentboob reblogged this from 1ucasvb
  6. brunzmeflugen reblogged this from 1ucasvb
  7. carolololine reblogged this from alyxandros
  8. one-nights-all-we-got reblogged this from pestered
  9. pestered reblogged this from visualizingmath
  10. blackholemetric reblogged this from watsonworms
  11. hirdanroulette reblogged this from visualizingmath
  12. watsonworms reblogged this from visualizingmath
  13. lagrange26 reblogged this from visualizingmath
  14. compose-myself reblogged this from lupinaroundthemoon
  15. austindoesdrumcorps reblogged this from renew-world
  16. renew-world reblogged this from visualizingmath
  17. abrackadabra reblogged this from alexjonesvevo
  18. alexjonesvevo reblogged this from ordnungsokonomik
  19. coldsmog reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  20. ordnungsokonomik reblogged this from mhd-hbd and added:
    Well isn’t a parabola just an ellipse that has one of the foci infinitely far away?? Calling it a parabola is a useful...
  21. mhd-hbd reblogged this from ordnungsokonomik and added:
    But a projectile travels along an ellipse, not a parabola…
  22. surelyyouwillnotdie reblogged this from stuff-that-irks-me
  23. rangerg reblogged this from stuff-that-irks-me